Virtual PAWs
Using virtualisation to create isolated admin environments — Hyper-V, client VMs, and host-based isolation approaches.
Overview
A virtual PAW uses a virtual machine running on a managed host device to create an isolated admin environment. The host OS is used for general computing, while the VM is dedicated to privileged administration — or vice versa.
This approach provides a middle ground between physical PAWs and cloud-hosted options.
Architecture options
Admin VM on user host
The admin runs a hardened VM on their standard work device. The VM is used exclusively for privileged tasks.
- Lower cost than a dedicated device
- Isolation depends on hypervisor security
- Risk: host compromise can affect the VM
User VM on admin host
The physical device is the PAW (hardened host), and a VM is used for general-purpose computing.
- Better security posture — the admin environment is the trusted base
- More complex to set up
- Better isolation model: untrusted activity runs inside the VM, not on the host
Dedicated hypervisor host
A purpose-built device running a bare-metal hypervisor with separate VMs for admin and user workloads.
- Highest isolation within a virtualisation approach
- Significant complexity
- Rarely practical outside large enterprises or high-security environments
Design considerations
- Use Hyper-V with Credential Guard and Device Guard on the host
- Apply application control policies to the admin VM
- Restrict clipboard, drive sharing, and USB passthrough between host and VM
- Manage the admin VM through a separate Intune or SCCM pipeline
- Apply Conditional Access device compliance to the VM identity
Trade-offs
Strengths:
- Single device for both admin and user work
- Lower hardware cost than physical PAWs
- Good isolation when properly configured
Challenges:
- Hypervisor escape is a theoretical risk
- Complex configuration and management
- User experience can suffer with VM-based workflows
- Requires endpoint hardware capable of running VMs efficiently
When virtual PAWs make sense
Virtual PAWs work well when:
- Physical PAWs are not feasible due to cost or logistics
- Cloud-hosted options are not viable
- The admin team is small and manageable
- The hypervisor platform is well-managed and patched
For most organisations today, cloud-hosted options (Windows 365, AVD) offer a better balance of isolation and usability. Virtual PAWs remain a valid option where cloud dependency is not acceptable.